QUOTE(Billy M @ Jul 23 2008, 01:52 PM)

I dare say that there are some who would reguard them as toys, but that would probably be the well heeled amoung us who dont need to do anything other than ride on a sunny summers day.
Of course the RC30 is a toy - no one in their right mind buys an RC30 (or RC45 or OW-1 or 916/996/999/1098 series or
any hypersports bike as a workhorse. And that includes the fireblade, the GSXR series, the ZX series, the FZRs, and in reality, if we're honest,
any cruiser ... you see where I'm going here? They're all bought because they're fun or look good. Did anyone jump on bikerchick for posting
this? They're not built just for transport. If that's what you want, buy a BSA M40, if you can find one, or a round tank, or a bantam. Or an MZ.
Now if someone buys a GT550 or 750 you
maybe can say, yes, that's a tool, a workhorse.
I know of plenty of people who will argue convincingly that, given how cheap cars are,
any motorbike is a toy. And it can be argued that unless you regularly commute in and out of the centre of one of a small selection of cities, they have a point.
My point is that Woody is standing leaning over the top of a very long and slippery slope, and his comments about what constitutes a toy and should be ranted against can apply to almost every bike if you really think about it. So taking the right-on class-war stance to rail against bikers who don't fit your own narrow definition of what actually
is a biker is a questionable practice, and I have to question the motives. For example, I commute every day that it's safe to do so on a bike in and out of London. I
could argue that anyone who doesn't do similar battle on a daily basis is a bit of a sham. Would that be fair? I don't think so, but it's certainly the same way of thinking.